Nano
Turning five people into a hundred
A workspace that lets a small team operate like an organization of hundreds, using LLMs to cut through the bottlenecks that slow traditional systems down.




The problem
Do large language models let a team of five operate like a team of a few hundred?
I wanted to take the question seriously. If the answer is no, I want to know exactly why. If it's yes, I want to know how, and Nano is my attempt at that.
What I built
Nano has an inside, an outside, and a layer that decides what the outside sees.
- Inside: Operations. The team and its LLMs work in the same apps: chat, email, CRM, tasks, calendar, calls with transcripts, docs and decks, search, prospecting, research, billing, customer success and delivery. The LLMs act in those apps, on the same data, rather than beside them.
- Outside: the overlay. What customers and visitors meet: booking pages, guest calls, a help center, support and feature requests, marketing and lead capture, a customer portal and public docs.
- Between them: management. Scheduling links, a customer console and admin decide what the outside sees. The external overlay is a view onto the same data the team works in, so nothing is copied between an internal tool and a customer-facing one.
How it works
Everything runs on one platform: hybrid search over everything the organization knows, an event queue that workers act on, mail in and out, LiveKit for calls, Stripe for billing, and Postgres with vectors. The inside, the outside and the bridge are all views onto that one set of data.
The highlighted path follows a customer request from the outside onto the team's plan.
What was hard
Recognizing the cost in the first place. Nobody budgets for handoffs. They show up as a week that felt busy and moved nothing, a customer who had to explain themselves twice, a decision nobody can find. Most organizations don't measure them, so they stay.
The engineering is the easier part. The harder part is looking at how work actually moves, naming each handoff out loud, and asking whether a shared system could make it disappear.
What I learned
Nano teams are the way. LLMs have made building so much easier that I expect a new wave of companies to start like this: a few people on one shared system, doing work that used to take hundreds. I think this way of organizing will spread with them.